Legal Opinion

In re Rothenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985.

On April 24, 2000, respondent was convicted upon his plea of guilty in United States District Court for the District of Connecticut to income tax evasion, in violation of 26 USC § 7201. He was sentenced to probation for two years and fined $10,000. In view of his conviction of a serious crime (see, Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [d]; Matter of Ng, 251 AD2d 810), we grant the motion by petitioner Committee on Professional Standards, which respondent advises he does not oppose, to suspend him from practice until such time as a final…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re NgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re UhlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API