Board of Public Education v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The important question for us to determine is whether the cost of lumber which was used for scaffolding, but which was not actually incorporated in the building erected by the contractor, is covered by his bond.
The bond in question was executed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 224, Vol. 29, Laws of Delaware, and provides for the payment of all lawful claims of “material men and laborers for labor performed, and materials furnished in the carrying forward, performing or completing” of the contract referred to in it.
It thus appears that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Marathon Paper Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Village of Rosemont v. Lentin Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Warner Co. v. SchoonoverCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934