Spratt v. General Electric Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject defendants’ contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking a trial preference. Plaintiffs made a sufficient showing that the interests of justice will be served by an early trial (see, CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; see also, Kellman v 45 Tiemann Assocs., 213 AD2d 151, affd 87 NY2d 871).
As a result of our decision in the prior appeal of this case (see, Spratt v General Elec. Co., 237 AD2d 922), the third-party action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kellman v. 45 Tiemann Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shanley v. Callanan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Kellman v. 45 Tiemann Assocs., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Spratt v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wassel v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- State v. Griffith Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002