Legal Opinion

Spratt v. General Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject defendants’ contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking a trial preference. Plaintiffs made a sufficient showing that the interests of justice will be served by an early trial (see, CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; see also, Kellman v 45 Tiemann Assocs., 213 AD2d 151, affd 87 NY2d 871).

As a result of our decision in the prior appeal of this case (see, Spratt v General Elec. Co., 237 AD2d 922), the third-party action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kellman v. 45 Tiemann Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Shanley v. Callanan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Kellman v. 45 Tiemann Assocs., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Spratt v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wassel v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. State v. Griffith Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API