Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Kaanaana

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

L. A. DICKEY, Esq.

Plaintiff brought a bill for partition of the real estate of Kaanaana, deceased, praying that certain property of the defendants Malika Keone and G. M. Keone, referred to as the “Nuka land,” be brought into hotch-pot because acquired as an advancement from Kaanaana (i. e., that partition be made according to Sec. 1457 of the Civil Code), and that certain *385rents collected by Malika Keone and husband from tbe land to be partitioned be accounted for.

Defendants Malika Keone and G. M. Keone answered, filing accounts and denying that they bad acquired tbe…