Hastings v. Herold
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
’Action by Henry Hensch, continued in the name of Frank Hastings, trustee in bankruptcy of Hensch, against Herman C. H. Herold, as collector of internal revenue at Jersey City, to recover special oleomargarine taxes assessed against Hensch and paid under protest.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
This suit was tried before the court without a jury; a jury having been waived pursuant to the statute. It was originally commenced in the First district court of the city of Newark, in the name of Henry Hensch, as plaintiff; but, as he was subsequently adjudged a bankrupt, his trustee was, by order of this court, substituted as plaintiff. The action was removed by certiorari from the city court to this court. The state of demand filed in that court sought to recover of the defendant the sum of $338.68, with interest from August 21, 1907, money paid to him as collector…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cheatham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Collector v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDowell v. KiehelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Public Service Ry. Co. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Loomis v. WattlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- H. B. Glover Co. v. BladineDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1928
- Talbot v. First & Security National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920