In Re Succession of Lefort
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SAUNDERS, Judge.
| ¶ Herein, we address whether the trial court committed manifest error in its partitioning of the newly discovered property of the succession of Mary Louida Arcen-eaux Lefort. For the following reasons, we affirm the ruling of the trial court but remand the matter so that a notary may be appointed to execute the partition in accordance with La.Code. Civ.P. art. 4605.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
The matter before us arises out of the succession of Mary Louida Arceneaux Le-fort (hereinafter referred to as “Mary Louida”). Mary Louida and Alexis Joseph Lefort, Jr. (hereinafter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Succession of McCarthyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991