Gaye v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.
| Appellant Quenton Gaye appeals an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R.Crim. P. 37. On appeal, Gaye argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that his trial counsel’s failure to seek a forthwith order or continuance to procure a defense witness’s presence at trial, or to proffer the testimony of that witness, was trial strategy and not a matter of ineffective assistance of counsel. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1 — 2(a)(7). We find no error and affirm.
Gaye was charged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Flores v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- State v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Gregory Joe Wickline v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, Acting for and on Behalf of Oklahoma State University And James Michael Holder, in His Individual Capacity and in His Capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015