Legal Opinion

Seligsberg v. Schepp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Abraham Seligsberg against Leopold Schepp. From an order granting inspection of plaintiff’s books and papers before answer, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover the balance due for services rendered under a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant.- The plaintiff’s firm had purchased, sold, cleared, and carried for the defendant stocks, bonds, wheat and silver certificates, and advanced moneys, at the request of the defendant, under an agreement by which the plaintiff’s firm was to be paid a commission and interest upon advances made, the plaintiff claiming that there is a balance due him of upwards of $13,000. The summons and complaint having been served, the defendant has applied for and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Currie v. VreelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API