Legal Opinion
Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Kinslow
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 11, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appellees, Charles and Roy Kinslow, obtained verdict and judgment against Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas) for $7500 based on their claim that Texas permanently damaged a spring situated on ap-pellees’ farm, incident to laying a gas pipeline.
For reversal the appellant presents five charges of error: (1) Parol evidence was erroneously admitted; (2) the verdict is excessive; (3) the verdict is not sustained by the evidence; (4) the trial court erroneously refused to strike certain testimony; and (5) the appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. should have been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
- Jones v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Commonwealth, Dept. of Highways v. SchmehrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
- Gerald Gresh v. Waste Services of America, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Fifth Third Bank v. WaxmanDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Earley M. Johnson, II v. Kentucky Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022