Legal Opinion

Dee v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 16, 1936No. 5973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Appellee filed its bill of interpleader under subsection 26 of section 41 of title 28 of the United States Code (44 Stat. 416, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (26), providing for bills of interpleader, against appellant Dee and one Dusky. The bill alleged that one Ernest Dusky, divorced husband of appellant, who died on November 9, 1935, held at that time a policy previously issued upon his life for $2,500; that appellant, the wife of the insured, was named therein as beneficiary; that the insured did not reserve the right to change such designation; that appellant made many, if not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calloway v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  2. In re SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Morgan v. KraftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  4. Novinger Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Radford v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. EgelineDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1939
  3. Girard Trust Co. v. VanceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. American-Hawaiian Steamship Co. v. Bowring & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Boice v. BoiceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API