Legal Opinion

Herold Motor Car Co. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 18, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing-

The commonwealth instituted these proceedings to forfeit and sell, pursuant to section 2554a-12 of the Statutes, a Reo truck owned by Thomas Newcomb and used by him in the illicit whisky traffic. The appellant intervened claiming a valid recorded lien against the truck and asserting its ignorance of Newcomb’s use of the machine in the traffic mentioned. The commonwealth demurred to the intervening petition, and its demurrer was sustained. On appeal to this court, that judgment was reversed. Herold Motor Car Co. v. Commonwealth, 216 Ky. 335, 287…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herold Motor Car Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Bonnell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API