Howell v. State

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary 1

Appellant-Defendant, Norton Howell (“Howell”), appeals his conviction for False Informing, 2 a class B misdemeanor. We affirm.

Issue

Howell raises one issue for our review which we restate as: whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction..

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to the verdict show that on May 16, 1996, Howell'was a passenger in an automobile pulled over by police for crossing the center line of the road. The driver indicated to the officer that he didn’t have a license and was a suspended driver. The officer…