Legal Opinion

In re S. A. Wenger & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, P. J.:

This is an appeal by the Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., vendee, from an order of the Special Term directing that it proceed to arbitrate certain disputes and controversies arising between it and S. A. Wenger & Co., Inc., vendor, out of and in connection with a certain contract dated June 27, 1923.

The petition alleged the making of the following contract

“ New York, June 27, 1923.
“ Gentlemen.— We beg to confirm the following sale made to you for our Yokohama Branch:
“ Sixty (60) Bales XX Crack White Japan “ 13 /15 den at $8.80 per lb.

Sales Governed by Raw Silk Rules &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Seaver v. . Lindsay Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Smith Co. v. MoscahladesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Setton v. Eberle-Albrecht Flour Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Dwane v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API