Legal Opinion

May v. Menton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 15, 1897Published

Appeal "by defendants from an affirmance by the General Term of the City Court of a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, entered upon tiie decision of a judge without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon premises 503 to 507 West Fiftieth street.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.

The plaintiff made a contract with one Menton to supply, for $115, tinwork in the erection of buildings under a contract between Menton and the owner, Ruth Ann Wallace, and, for the balance remaining unpaid under his employment, filed a mechanic’s lien. The lien was discharged by the giving of a bond with sureties, under .the. statute, and this action was brought to establish the lien and to recover a personal judgment against the contractor and the sureties. The defendants interposed a general denial, and the trial was had by the court and a jury, the latter finding -upon the special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hedges v. PolhemusNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  2. Stiefel v. New York Novelty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API