Legal Opinion

Geeslin v. Skandalakis (In Re Geeslin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided July 17, 2003No. 19-50220PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN T. LANEY, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

On May 12, 2003, the Court held a hearing on a Motion for Contempt Against Peter Skandalakis (“Respondent”), a Georgia District Attorney, (“Contempt Motion”) filed by Arthur Geeslin, Jr. (“Debtor”). During oral argument, the following issues were raised: Whether Respondent’s actions to collect the forfeited bail bond because the principal did not appear for trial are subject’ to the automatic stay and the discharge injunction, when Debtor has received a discharge of debts under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (“Code”).…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Skandalakis v. GeeslinDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API