Legal Opinion

Bakurjian v. Pugh

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1935No. Civ. 8836PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff and respondent received injuries in an automobile accident, consisting of a sprain of the left shoulder, a laceration of the left upper lip, laceration of the palmar surface of the right little finger, a laceration of the left forearm, a laceration of the right forearm, swelling and discoloration of the left knee and left eye. Some of the testimony indicated that the scars from the lacerations are permanent and that at the time of the trial there was still some disability in the injured finger. A jury awarded her a verdict of $500. Judgment having been entered on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Lambert v. KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Phillips v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Zurich Insurance v. Coachella Valley Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Harper v. Superior Air Parts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Bray v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API