Carter v. State

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for armed robbery. The sole enumeration of error reads as follows: “Did the trial court err, while granting the defendant’s Motion to Suppress a show-up identification, in allowing an out-of-court photographic display identification into evidence, and the subsequent in-court identification, when the defendant had been advised of his right to counsel, demanded an attorney, but was denied counsel at this level *446of the proceeding?” Held:

Decided February 10, 1981. William E. Moore, Jr., for appellant. H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney,…