Ruella v. MacCauley
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The questions raised on this appeal are not new, nor are they difficult to determine. The defendant below (appellant here) ran his truck into the rear of a stationary motor vehicle, in which the plaintiff was seated. At the trial, the defendant admitted liability; thereby conceding that the collision occurred, his negligence caused it and the plaintiff had suffered some damage as a result thereof. Cf. Smith v. Dolan, 170 Md. 654, 657.
The appellant claims that the trial court did not adequately instruct the jury on the burden of proof upon the plaintiff as to his injuries, damages and losses;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Adams v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- West v. Belle Isle Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- American Stores Co. v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lemons Ex Rel. Bankers Mutual Insurance v. Maryland Chicken ProcessorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Aronstamn v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Peterson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Sullivan v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975