Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamby v. McDaniel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1977Published

1DissentBrock, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

While the Tennessee Wrongful Death Statute did, as the majority notes, change a rule of the common law, it does not follow that the statute must be strictly construed. See, e. g., Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. Hurd, 209 Tenn. 369, 355 S.W.2d 436 (1962). Statutes changing common-law rules may also be remedial, 82 C.J.S. Statutes § 388 (1953), and thus, entitled to a liberal construction so as to effectuate the purposes for which they were enacted.

“Death statutes have their roots in dissatisfaction with the archaisms of the [earlier] law . . . . It would be a misfortune…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. HurdTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Shousha v. Matthews Drivurself Service, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Creighton v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API