Legal Opinion
Pauly v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided October 15, 1958No. Claim No. 34899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard Ryan, P. J.
This is written to accompany a formal decision in an appropriation case and to state the court’s position on certain questions raised during the course of the trial in the hope that thus it may be clarified. These questions relate both to the admissibility of evidence and to rules of law and to the measure of damages.
First. Both claimant and defendant availed themselves of section 16 of the Court of Claims Act and served notice that upon the trial it was proposed to offer evidence with respect to sales of certain real property said to be comparable to that owned by the claimant. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- International Paper Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Newman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Anderson v. United States. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Gilmore v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. WertzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- County of Westchester v. P. & M. Materials Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Grossinger Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
- Power Authority v. GoldNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Foster v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961