Legal Opinion

Smith v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1934No. 24860. En BancPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

During the month of January, 1932, J. L. Smith, then engaged in extrahazardous work and within the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act, suffered an injury which resulted in his receiving care and compensation for time lost. His claim was closed March 12, 1932, without award for any permanent partial disability.

July 15, 1932, he applied for a rehearing before the joint board, alleging aggravation of his injuries. Claimant, not having applied for such a rehearing •within sixty days from the date of the closing of his claim by the department, was limited before the joint board to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Dept. Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Babic v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Groff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hastings v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Spalding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. LaLone v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API