Ames v. Town of Painter
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentJustice Whiting
In my opinion “the record itself, taken as a whole, suffices to render the issue fairly debatable.”
The evidence before the board establishes that during the prior year, there were six migrant workers housed in the subject building, plus a “man and his wife and three or four children.” Upon *351questioning by the board’s chairman and counsel for the Ameses, every witness agreed that such occupancy did not affect the surrounding community in any of the ways that they feared.
At the end of the hearing, the member who moved to deny the 20-worker application read certain provisions of the ordinance,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sherman v. FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Thorpe v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF TOWN OF NORTH KINGSTOWNSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- County Bd. of Arlington County v. BraticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Schenkel v. Allen County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Vahle v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of CantonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.