Glassman v. Deauville Enterprises, Inc.

This interlocutory appeal seeks review of an order denying a motion for decree on bill and answer entered after the opinion and mandate of this court in said cause, reported in 101 So.2d 432.

In entering the order appealed, the trial judge erroneously concluded “that the former equity practice known as ‘motion for decree on bill and answer’ no longer obtains in this state”. Since the decisions of this court in City of Miami v. Miami Transit Company, Fla.App. 1957, 96 So.2d 799; Tropicaire Engineering Service Corp. v. Chrysler Airtemp Sales Corporation, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 149, and the…