Baker v. Metallizing Company of America
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
1. Although assignments of error should specifically and definitely set out the error complained of so that this court will not be compelled to grope in ascertaining what the error is, it has been held that a general assignment of error on a ruling of the court is sufficient when a copy of the ruling is attached to the bill of exceptions. Cain v. Tuten, 82 Ga. App. 102, 106 (60 S. E. 2d 485); Green v. Orr, 75 Ga. App. 673, 674 (44 S. E. 2d 273). This court will not dismiss the bill of exceptions on the ground that the plaintiff failed more specifically to describe the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. LawmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Pratt v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Folsom v. Continental Adjustment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Greene v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Cain v. TutenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Float-Away Door Company and National Surety Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Black & White Construction Co. v. Bolden Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Haywood v. Wooden Peg, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Fitzgerald v. United Virginia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.