Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunt v. S. M. Fronizer

Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 15, 1905Published

1Opinion of the CourtWlRDMAN, J.

On demurrers of plaintiff to answers of the Bellefontaine Bridge & Iron 'Company-, and others.

T-liis case is, as I understand, one of a number instituted in Sandusky and other counties involving questions of great importance to the public and to persons and corporations dealing with the counties through the officials of the latter.

The actions are brought under the powers understood to be conferred by Bevised Statutes, 1277, as now amended. This section authorizes prosecuting attorneys to institute actions in the name of the state to restrain any contemplated misapplication of county funds, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Coffinberry v. Sun Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Lee v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Vindicator Printing Co. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API