Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 28, 1944No. Docket Nos. 112627, 112628Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

C. T. Haskell v. Commissioner. Emma B. Haskell v. Commissioner.

Haskell v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 112627, 112628.

United States Tax Court

1944 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 348; 3 T.C.M. (CCH) 179; T.C.M. (RIA) 44062;

February 28, 1944

C. T. Haskell, pro se, for the petitioner. W. H. Payne, Esq., for the respondent.

DISNEY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DISNEY Judge: These proceedings involve the redetermination of deficiencies of $531.95 and $348.13 in income taxes of the respective petitioners for the year 1940. The issue is whether the respondent erred in disallowing a bad debt deduction of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Gottlieb Realty Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. Grenada Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API