Legal Opinion

Waxson Realty Corp. v. Rothschild

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Consideration of the statute (Real Prop. Law, § 43) and the decisions now called to our attention makes it doubtful whether the will does, strictly speaking, unlawfully suspend the power of alienation. (Purdy v. Hayt, 92 N. Y. 446; Matter of Ryder, 41 App. Div. 247.) In our opinion, however, this does not change the result. Sections 42 and 43 of the Real Property Law, read together, indicate the intention that there should be no limitation either by life estate or by way of trust beyond two *705lives, and that valid suspensions may not be added to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Purdy v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Steinway v. . SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Vandenburgh v. VandenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of RyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API