Legal Opinion

Tate v. Torcoutt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Submitted on briefs April 11, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLoara-, J.

November 18, 1890, the plaintiff loaned to one Alphens Tibbitts §150, and to secure the money he took from 'ffibbitts a chattel mortgage on a quantity of personal prop ;y, among which was a span of horses. Before the mortgá e became due, Tibbitts, contrary to the terms of it, remo red the horses out of the county of Oceana, where the mortgage was given, and sold them to the defendant, who lived at that time in the county of Newaygo. The plaintiff, learning of that fact, on January o, 1891, went to the defendant's residence, where a written agreement was drawn up between them, as follows:

“This…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Flood v. ButzbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API