Legal Opinion

Wainwright v. Bartlett, Judge

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1928No. 2809PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in mandamus, brought to compel the Second judicial district court of the State of Nevada to reset a will contest for a second trial before a second jury. After filing the contest, the petitioner, contestant in the court below, requested a jury trial, which was granted, and the cause thereafter regularly tried and submitted. Two forms of general verdict were given to the jury, when it retired, together with three forms of special verdict. The special verdicts requested were as follows: (1) Was J. B. Wainwright of sound mind and disposing memory at the time…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stevens v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Shaw v. ShawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Moody v. FoundIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Parker v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cheung v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Aftercare of Clark County v. Justice Court of Las Vegas Township Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Western Realty Co. v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Foley v. KennedyNevada Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API