Legal Opinion
Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 20, 2018No. 12-1342; C/w 12-1343, 12-1344, 12-1425, 12-1480, 13-1003, 13-1045, 13-1129, 13-1178, 13-1179, 13-1180PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, Senior Circuit Judge:
On June 7, 2012 the Environmental Protection Agency issued another rule in a long succession of actions implementing Congress's effort to restore air quality and visibility in certain national parks and wilderness areas ("Class I areas") to what they would be under natural conditions. Regional Haze: Revisions to Provisions Governing Alternatives to Source-Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations, Limited SIP Disapprovals, and Federal Implementation Plans, 77 Fed. Reg. 33,642 (June 7, 2012) (" Final Rule "). In the rule, EPA took a step…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Public Citizen, Inc., Aviation Consumer Action Project, and Families of Pan-Am 103/lockerbie v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- E.P.A. v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Catawba County v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Thomas RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Natural Res. Def. Council v. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Thomas Robertson (AMENDED OPINION)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024