Boykin v. State

FARMER, Judge.

From all the contentions of error, we find only one that deserves extended comment, and none that require a reversal.1 Appellant contends that hearsay from a police officer was improper and requires a new trial. He likens the subject testimony to Harris v. State, 544 So.2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (police officer improperly testified that an informant told him that a described person was supplying him with cocaine); Baird v. State, 553 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), quashed, 572 So.2d 904 (Fla.1990) (officer’s testimony that he received information that defendant was operating a…