Legal Opinion

United States v. Dan Caputo Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1998No. 96-16563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on June 3,1998 is redesignated as per curiam opinion.

OPINION

2Per curiam

The district court dismissed the Union’s False Claims Act complaint in order to allow the Department of Labor to “make[ ] its findings on the particular facts of this case, and rule[ ] on whether these defendants misclassified their employees for the purposes of the Davis-Baeon Act.” In accordance with our request, the Department filed with the court a status report and supplemental status report. These reports indicate that as of December 31,1997 the Department completed all investigations into…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States Ex Rel. Windsor v. Dyncorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  4. United States v. HenriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Dan Caputo Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API