Legal Opinion

North v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 2017No. Case 2D16-2030PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, Judge.

The circuit court ruled that Shane North could not tell a jury he had been given permission to take his employer’s scrap materials for himself. That jury found him guilty of two counts of dealing in stolen property. 1 Because the circuit court erred when it ruled this testimony was inadmissible hearsay, we reverse Mr. North’s judgment of conviction and sentences and remand his case for a new trial.

Mr. North was a foreman involved in a dismantling project for a shuttered power plant, a job which entailed removing copper cables, electrical bus bars, rectifiers, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BairdSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Marvin Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BRENDAN SIGISMONDI v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  2. Philip Morris USA v. GlogerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API