Metropolitan Dade County v. Brisker
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
485 So.2d 1349 (1986)
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant.
v.
Samuel BRISKER and Gertrude Brisker, His Wife, and Eleanor Krieg and Anna Maultasch, Appellees.
No. 84-2803.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 1, 1986.
Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Eileen Ball Mehta, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellant.
Steel, Hector & Davis and Darrey A. Davis, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
REVISED OPINION
BASKIN, Judge.
The litigation involved in this appeal pertains to the validity of a Dade County zoning ordinance as…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Ferguson; Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2; Concurrence · Pearson.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. GoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Moviematic Industries Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Dade County v. United Resources, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- BROWARD CTY. v. Capeletti Bros., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- DADE CTY. v. Inversiones Rafamar, SADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lake Lucerne Civic Association, Inc. v. Dolphin Stadium Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Koziara v. City of CasselberryDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002