Legal Opinion

Armat Moving Picture Co. v. Edison Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 24, 1903No. 184PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The appeal herein is taken from an order continuing a preliminary injunction previously granted to restrain defendant from infringing complainant’s patent, No. 586,953, issued July 20, 1897, to Jenkins and Armat, for improvements in phantoscopes.

Complainant contends that the order is not appealable, because the court continued the original injunction instead of first formally vacating and then continuing it. Section 7 of the Evarts act, as amended by the act of June 6, 1900 (chapter 803, 31 Stat. 660 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 550]), provides for an appeal from “any…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Picture Theatres, Inc. v. Foundation Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. Electrical Engineers' Equipment Co. v. Champion Switch Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Hilditch v. American Bumper CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  4. Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Waldorf-Astoria Hotel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API