Legal Opinion

Oregon Terminals Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 28, 1934No. Docket No. 68893Published

Under the facts herein, held that petitioner was not required to accrue as income rentals owing to it under lease which in all probability it would never receive.

1Opinion of the Court

OREGON TERMINALS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Oregon Terminals Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 68893.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 1332; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1399;

February 28, 1934, Promulgated

Under the facts herein, held that petitioner was not required to accrue as income rentals owing to it under lease which in all probability it would never receive.

Charles E. McCulloch, Esq., and Ivan F. Phipps, Esq., for the petitioner.

Willis R. Lansford, Esq., for the respondent.

ARUNDELL

The respondent determined a deficiency in income tax for the fiscal year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oregon Terminals Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API