Legal Opinion · Dissent

Frank S. Scott, Jr. v. The United States. Alvin C. Warnick and Barbara W. Warnick v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 16, 1970No. 36-66, 64-66Published

1DissentNichols, Judge

As Judge Davis points out, a regulation of long standing, Treas.Reg. § 1.-871-2(b) purports to define when an alien present in the United States is a “resident” under our income tax laws, and Reg. § 1.911-2(a) (2) incorporates it “to the extent feasible” by reference in the determination of what American citizens are bona fide foreign residents under § 911.

Under Reg. § 1.871-2(b) one who comes to the United States for a definite purpose, which “may be promptly accomplished”, is a “transient”, but if “an extended stay” is necessary to accomplish his purpose he may become a resident even if he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Menon v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API