Legal Opinion
State v. Carto
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 2015No. 14-KA-736PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.
|2In this criminal appeal, defendant claims that he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at the trial level in connection with' his guilty plea to armed robbery in violation of La. R.S. 14:64. Defendant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to reserve defendant’s right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress his statement, pursuant to State v. Crosby.1 For the following reasons, we find defendant has failed to meet his burden to prove ineffective assistance of counsel. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. TorrenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015