Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1935No. 25749. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The controlling facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff, while engaged in extrahazardous employment, sustained an injury to his right arm. He was allowed time loss for four months. His claim was then closed by the department, with an award of four degrees for partial permanent disability. He appealed to the joint board, which sustained the order of the department. Prom these orders, he appealed to the superior court, which entered judgment sustaining the department and the joint board and dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.

At the time of the injury, there was an arthritic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ray v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McGuire v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Elliott v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Windust v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Windust v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API