Legal Opinion

Daniels v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1925No. A-5377PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

The information in this case charged that •in Ellis county, May 19, 1924, Eugene Daniels and Harley Daniels did have in their possession one still and still worm. On the trial the defendant Harley Daniels was acquitted and the defendant Eugene Daniels was found guilty and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals.

Of the various errors assigned it is only necessary to consider the one, that the court erred in admitting incompetent evidence over the objections of the defendant.

The evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Wiese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Foreman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stump v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Siverson v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Gransbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API