Legal Opinion

Knighton v. Bramlett

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1954No. 16918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, Justice.

The question in this appeal is whether or not attorneys’ fees are allowable as damages upon the dissolution of an attachment and if such are allowable and not requested at the time of the dissolution of the attachment does the doctrine of estoppel or waiver apply so as to preclude the recovery of such in a separate suit.

On or about November 13, 1952, under Section 10-908, Code of Laws for South Carolina, John A.'Bramlett, Jr., sued out a writ of attachment on one Chevrolet car then on the lot of H. S. Knighton and Toy Taylor, d/b/a City Motor Company, a partnership, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frick Company, Inc. v. DeiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. v. Jus' Tennis, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API