Carter v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
*275Justice Ginsburg,
with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Breyer join, dissenting.
At common law, robbery meant larceny plus force, violence, or putting in fear. Because robbery was an aggravated form of larceny at common law, larceny was a lesser included offense of robbery. Congress, I conclude, did not depart from that traditional understanding when it rendered “Bank robbery and incidental crimes” federal offenses. Accordingly, I would hold that petitioner Carter is not prohibited as a matter of law from obtaining an instruction on bank larceny as a lesser included offense.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.