State v. Blair
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Jeffrey 1 Blair, appeals pro se from the judgment of the Clark County Common Pleas Court denying his postconviction application for DNA testing. By statute, a trial court is precluded from accepting an application for DNA testing unless the offender can show that a new test would produce an exclusion result or that such a result would have been outcome determinative at trial. Blair has not and cannot show this, so the trial court properly rejected his application.
I. Background
{¶ 2} In 1988, Bridget Buxton's body was found in the Mad River. The following year, a jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BlairOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RameyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BirtOhio Court of Appeals · 2023