Legal Opinion

State v. Blair

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2018No. 2017-CA-75PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Jeffrey 1 Blair, appeals pro se from the judgment of the Clark County Common Pleas Court denying his postconviction application for DNA testing. By statute, a trial court is precluded from accepting an application for DNA testing unless the offender can show that a new test would produce an exclusion result or that such a result would have been outcome determinative at trial. Blair has not and cannot show this, so the trial court properly rejected his application.

I. Background

{¶ 2} In 1988, Bridget Buxton's body was found in the Mad River. The following year, a jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. BlairOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RameyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. BirtOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API