Legal Opinion
Caremark Therapeutic Services v. Thompson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 27, 2003No. 01 Civ. 11316(VM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Caremark Therapeutic Services (“Caremark”) brings this action against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 1 in response to an overpayment determination made by an insurance carrier, Noridian Mutual Insurance Company (“Noridian”) contracted by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) to administer Medicare Part B claims. Care-mark seeks to compel the Secretary to reopen the matter and conduct an administrative hearing, and it asserts jurisdiction…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caremark Therapeutic Services v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Borrelli v. Secretary of TreasuryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Coe v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Doe v. Helen Hayes HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Silas Marungo v. ColettiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025