Holliday v. City of Modesto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
May a public employer order one of its employees, on pain of suspension, demotion, or termination, to submit to drug testing without first complying with the “meet and confer” requirements of the MeyersMilias-Brown Act (Gov. Code, 1 § 3500 et seq., hereinafter MMBA)? Under the circumstances of this case, we answer the question no.
Summary of Facts and Procedural History
Appellant Jerry Allen Holliday concedes there is no factual dispute on appeal.
Holliday was a fire lieutenant with the City of Modesto, having been employed with the fire department for some 18 years. His past…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Everett v. NapperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Turner v. Fraternal Order of PoliceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Claremont Police Officers Ass'n v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2024
- Claremont Police Officers Ass'n v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.