Legal Opinion

Pape v. Westerdale

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1963No. 50761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

— 'Plaintiff, a licensed real-estate broker as required by chapter 117, Code of 1958, sues to recover a commission from defendant for services performed in city of Davenport, Iowa. As a defense it is alleged failure of plaintiff to have a license, as required by the city of Davenport, bars his right to collect commission for services rendered as such a broker. The court, under rule 105, struck this defense and defendant appeals.

The city of Davenport, Iowa, operates under a special charter. City Ordinance 100, subsection 3, requires that a real-estate broker, before acting as such in the city,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Iowa-Nebraska Light & Power Co. v. City of VilliscaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Hansen v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Scott v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. City of Burlington v. KellarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bechtel v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API