Legal Opinion · Dissent

Evans v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1986No. 2-985A286Published

1DissentBuchanan, Chief Judge

I must respectfully dissent. In my view, the result in this case is controlled by the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision in Hanks v. State (1985), Ind., 484 N.E.2d 14. *810There Justice Shepard, writing for a unanimous court, held that a defendant's fingerprint found on a mirror which was moved to gain access to stolen items in a burglarized house was sufficient evidence to sustain the defendant's convictions for burglary and theft. This was so even though the fingerprint was the only physical evidence connecting defendant with the crimes. The defendant had visited the victim's home about ten…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hanks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Curry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API