Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Clement

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth District Court for the Parish.of Assumption, Gole, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSfobfobd, J.

(Buchanan, J., absent.) The defendant and appellant contends that her plea of prescription should have been sustained.

Taking into view all the circumstances of the case; we think an interruption of prescription has been satisfactorily shown.

Endorsements of partial payments in the handwriting of the holder of a bond are not of themselves sufficient proof of an interruption. But it is proved here, not only that the endorsements were in the handwriting of the; creditor, but other facts are shown leading inevitably to the- conclusion that he made them before prescription was acquired in favor of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haver v. SchwyhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Cullota v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Heinz v. TourneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Zimmer v. CaumontLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API