Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1993No. A92A2079Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent with respect to the admissibility of the test results of the fetus’ blood. This evidence, considered in Division 2 of the majority opinion, should have been suppressed. I concur in Division 1.

Defendant advances several arguments against admissibility: the autopsy and subsequent blood testing were not authorized by her and thus were subject to the requirement of a search warrant on Fourth Amendment and state constitutional grounds; the Georgia Death Investigation Act did not authorize the procedure because the stillborn fetus, which weighed two pounds eight ounces and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API