Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Presiding Judge
I respectfully dissent with respect to the admissibility of the test results of the fetus’ blood. This evidence, considered in Division 2 of the majority opinion, should have been suppressed. I concur in Division 1.
Defendant advances several arguments against admissibility: the autopsy and subsequent blood testing were not authorized by her and thus were subject to the requirement of a search warrant on Fourth Amendment and state constitutional grounds; the Georgia Death Investigation Act did not authorize the procedure because the stillborn fetus, which weighed two pounds eight ounces and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.