Legal Opinion
King v. Randazzo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 24, 1965No. 412, Docket 29267PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge.
These appeals arise from a dispute over the obligation of members of Local 1476 of the International Longshoremen’s Association (“ILA”) to pay certain *309dues. The plaintiffs are several members of Local 1476; the defendants are the president and secretary-treasurer of the Sugar Workers Council, which they describe as a coordinating body for ILA locals representing employees in the sugar industry.
The relevant facts are set out in the opinion of Judge Bartels, 234 F.Supp. 388. In brief, the dispute stems from the defendants’ attempt to collect from the members of Local 1476…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- King v. RandazzoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
3Cited by11 opinions
- Benjamin R. Burroughs, William H. Gault and William T. Keane v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 Dale Marr and Harold HustonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Agola v. HagnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- White v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Crowley v. Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen, & PackersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
- King v. RandazzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.